Journal Article (Review Article) DKFZ-2019-02619

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis.

 ;  ;  ;  ;

2019
British Medical Association56099 London

The BMJ 367, l6109 () [10.1136/bmj.l6109]
 GO

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: To review and summarise the evidence on the prevalence of colorectal adenomas and cancers at a follow-up screening colonoscopy after negative index colonoscopy, stratified by interval between examinations and by sex.Systematic review and meta-analysis of all available studies.PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Two investigators independently extracted characteristics and results of identified studies and performed standardised quality ratings.Studies assessing the outcome of a follow-up colonoscopy among participants at average risk for colorectal cancer with a negative previous colonoscopy (no adenomas).28 studies were identified, including 22 cohort studies, five cross sectional studies, and one case-control study. Findings for an interval between colonoscopies of one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years were reported by 17, 16, and three studies, respectively. Summary estimates of prevalences of any neoplasm were 20.7% (95% confidence interval 15.8% to 25.5%), 23.0% (18.0% to 28.0%), and 21.9% (14.9% to 29.0%) for one to five, five to 10, and more than 10 years between colonoscopies. Corresponding summary estimates of prevalences of any advanced neoplasm were 2.8% (2.0% to 3.7%), 3.2% (2.2% to 4.1%), and 7.0% (5.3% to 8.7%). Seven studies also reported findings stratified by sex. Summary estimates stratified by interval and sex were consistently higher for men than for women.Although detection of any neoplasms was observed in more than 20% of participants within five years of a negative screening colonoscopy, detection of advanced neoplasms within 10 years was rare. Our findings suggest that 10 year intervals for colonoscopy screening after a negative colonoscopy, as currently recommended, may be adequate, but more studies are needed to strengthen the empirical basis for pertinent recommendations and to investigate even longer intervals.Prospero CRD42019127842.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternsforschung (C070)
  2. DKTK Heidelberg (L101)
  3. Präventive Onkologie (C120)
Research Program(s):
  1. 313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313) (POF3-313)

Appears in the scientific report 2019
Database coverage:
Medline ; BIOSIS Previews ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Current Contents - Life Sciences ; Ebsco Academic Search ; IF >= 15 ; JCR ; NCBI Molecular Biology Database ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Thomson Reuters Master Journal List ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2019-11-19, last modified 2024-02-29


Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)