Journal Article DKFZ-2020-00076

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Fractionated carbon ion irradiations of the rat spinal cord: comparison of the relative biological effectiveness with predictions of the local effect model.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2020
BioMed Central London

Radiation oncology 15(1), 6 () [10.1186/s13014-019-1439-1]
 GO

Abstract: To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and α/β-values after fractionated carbon ion irradiations of the rat spinal cord with varying linear energy transfer (LET) to benchmark RBE-model calculations.The rat spinal cord was irradiated with 6 fractions of carbon ions at 6 positions within a 6 cm spread-out Bragg-peak (SOBP, LET: 16-99 keV/μm). TD50-values (dose at 50% complication probability) were determined from dose-response curves for the endpoint radiation induced myelopathy (paresis grade II) within 300 days after irradiation. Based on TD50-values of 15 MV photons, RBE-values were calculated and adding previously published data, the LET and fractional dose-dependence of the RBE was used to benchmark the local effect model (LEM I and IV).At six fractions, TD50-values decreased from 39.1 ± 0.4 Gy at 16 keV/μm to 17.5 ± 0.3 Gy at 99 keV/μm and the RBE increased accordingly from 1.46 ± 0.05 to 3.26 ± 0.13. Experimental α/β-ratios ranged from 6.9 ± 1.1 Gy to 44.3 ± 7.2 Gy and increased strongly with LET. Including all available data, comparison with model-predictions revealed that (i) LEM IV agrees better in the SOBP, while LEM I fits better in the entrance region, (ii) LEM IV describes the slope of the RBE within the SOBP better than LEM I, and (iii) in contrast to the strong LET-dependence, the RBE-deviations depend only weakly on fractionation within the measured range.This study extends the available RBE data base to significantly lower fractional doses and performes detailed tests of the RBE-models LEM I and IV. In this comparison, LEM IV agrees better with the experimental data in the SOBP than LEM I. While this could support a model replacement in treatment planning, careful dosimetric analysis is required for the individual patient to evaluate potential clinical consequences.

Classification:

Note: #EA:E040#LA:E040#

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. E040 Med. Physik in der Strahlentherapie (E040)
  2. E050 KKE Strahlentherapie (E050)
Research Program(s):
  1. 315 - Imaging and radiooncology (POF3-315) (POF3-315)

Appears in the scientific report 2020
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) ; DOAJ ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; DOAJ Seal ; Ebsco Academic Search ; NCBI Molecular Biology Database ; PubMed Central ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > E040
Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2020-01-07, last modified 2024-02-29



Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)