Journal Article (Review Article) DKFZ-2020-02845

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
How to use and assess qualitative research methods.

 ;  ;

2020
BioMed Central [London]

Neurological research and practice 2(1), 14 () [10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z]
 GO

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: This paper aims to provide an overview of the use and assessment of qualitative research methods in the health sciences. Qualitative research can be defined as the study of the nature of phenomena and is especially appropriate for answering questions of why something is (not) observed, assessing complex multi-component interventions, and focussing on intervention improvement. The most common methods of data collection are document study, (non-) participant observations, semi-structured interviews and focus groups. For data analysis, field-notes and audio-recordings are transcribed into protocols and transcripts, and coded using qualitative data management software. Criteria such as checklists, reflexivity, sampling strategies, piloting, co-coding, member-checking and stakeholder involvement can be used to enhance and assess the quality of the research conducted. Using qualitative in addition to quantitative designs will equip us with better tools to address a greater range of research problems, and to fill in blind spots in current neurological research and practice.

Keyword(s): Mixed methods ; Qualitative research ; Quality assessment

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. KKE Neuroonkologie (B320)
Research Program(s):
  1. 312 - Functional and structural genomics (POF3-312) (POF3-312)

Appears in the scientific report 2020
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) ; DOAJ ; DOAJ Seal
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2020-12-17, last modified 2024-02-29


Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)