001 | 169697 | ||
005 | 20240303004806.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3390/cancers13123010 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:34208476 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:136044231 |2 altmetric |
037 | _ | _ | |a DKFZ-2021-01504 |
041 | _ | _ | |a English |
082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Hibbert, Julia |0 P:(DE-He78)9d0264be3c1caadf9a94dcd1cb8b4f53 |b 0 |e First author |u dkfz |
245 | _ | _ | |a Sensitivity and Specificity of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 Early Antigen Serology for HPV-Driven Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. |
260 | _ | _ | |a Basel |c 2021 |b MDPI |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1635318909_25420 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |x Review Article |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
500 | _ | _ | |a #EA:F022#LA:F022# |
520 | _ | _ | |a Antibodies against HPV16 early proteins have been shown to be promising biomarkers for the identification of HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) among OPC cases in multiple studies. A systematic literature search was performed to identify original research articles comparing HPV early antigen serology with established reference methods to determine molecular HPV tumor status. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity of HPV16 E2, E6 and E7 serology for HPV-OPC. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity across studies and describe variables associated with test performance. We identified n = 23 studies meeting all eligibility criteria and included these in the meta-analysis. E6 serology showed the best performance with pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates of 83.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72.5-90.2%) and 94.6% (95% CI 89.0-97.4%), respectively, while E2 and E7 serological assays were highly specific (E2: 92.5% (95% CI 79.1-97.6%); E7: 88.5% (95% CI 77.9-94.4%)) but moderately sensitive (E2: 67.8% (95% CI 58.9-75.6%); E7: 67.0% (95% CI 63.2-70.6%)). Subgroup analyses revealed increased pooled sensitivity for bacterially (89.9% (95% CI 84.5-93.6%)) vs. in vitro expressed E6 antigen (55.3% (95% CI 41.0-68.7%)), while both showed high specificity (95.2% (95% CI 93.0-96.7%) and 91.1% (95% CI 46.6-99.2%), respectively). Pooled specificity estimates for HPV16 E2, E6 and E7 serology were significantly lower in studies utilizing HPV DNA PCR as the only molecular reference method compared to those using a combination of any two reference methods (HPV DNA, RNA, in situ hybridization (ISH), p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC)), or histopathological reference methods (ISH or p16 IHC) as stand-alone marker. In conclusion, HPV16 E6 seropositivity is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for HPV-OPC. However, its performance differs between serological assays and depends on molecular reference methods. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 316 - Infektionen, Entzündung und Krebs (POF4-316) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-316 |c POF4-316 |f POF IV |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo01.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de |
650 | _ | 7 | |a HPV |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a antibodies |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a meta-analysis |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a oropharyngeal cancer |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a sensitivity |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a serology |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a specificity |2 Other |
650 | _ | 7 | |a systematic review |2 Other |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Halec, Gordana |0 P:(DE-He78)94cc2690204e1d82d8ca318b17cd2e65 |b 1 |u dkfz |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Baaken, Dan |b 2 |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Waterboer, Tim |0 P:(DE-He78)6b4ebb9791b983b5620c0caaf3468e30 |b 3 |u dkfz |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Brenner, Nicole |0 P:(DE-He78)b1326dc42cbbc5f92b10fe5f254f0bc2 |b 4 |e Last author |u dkfz |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.3390/cancers13123010 |g Vol. 13, no. 12, p. 3010 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2527080-1 |n 12 |p 3010 |t Cancers |v 13 |y 2021 |x 2072-6694 |
909 | C | O | |p VDB |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:169697 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-He78)9d0264be3c1caadf9a94dcd1cb8b4f53 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-He78)94cc2690204e1d82d8ca318b17cd2e65 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-He78)6b4ebb9791b983b5620c0caaf3468e30 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum |0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0 |k DKFZ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-He78)b1326dc42cbbc5f92b10fe5f254f0bc2 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-316 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Infektionen, Entzündung und Krebs |x 0 |
913 | 0 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Gesundheit |l Krebsforschung |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-310 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-316 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-300 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Infections and cancer |x 0 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2021 |
915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b CANCERS : 2019 |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Blind peer review |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV |2 V:(DE-HGF) |b DOAJ |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b CANCERS : 2019 |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2021-05-04 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2021-05-04 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)F022-20160331 |k F022 |l Infektionen und Krebs-Epidemiologie |x 0 |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-He78)F020-20160331 |k F020 |l Infektionen und Krebs-Epidemiologie |x 1 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)F022-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-He78)F020-20160331 |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|