guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Sensitivity and Specificity of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 Early Antigen Serology for HPV-Driven Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| Home > Publications database > Sensitivity and Specificity of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 Early Antigen Serology for HPV-Driven Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| Journal Article (Review Article) | DKFZ-2021-01504 |
; ; ; ;
2021
MDPI
Basel
This record in other databases: 
Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:10.3390/cancers13123010
Abstract: Antibodies against HPV16 early proteins have been shown to be promising biomarkers for the identification of HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) among OPC cases in multiple studies. A systematic literature search was performed to identify original research articles comparing HPV early antigen serology with established reference methods to determine molecular HPV tumor status. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity of HPV16 E2, E6 and E7 serology for HPV-OPC. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity across studies and describe variables associated with test performance. We identified n = 23 studies meeting all eligibility criteria and included these in the meta-analysis. E6 serology showed the best performance with pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates of 83.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 72.5-90.2%) and 94.6% (95% CI 89.0-97.4%), respectively, while E2 and E7 serological assays were highly specific (E2: 92.5% (95% CI 79.1-97.6%); E7: 88.5% (95% CI 77.9-94.4%)) but moderately sensitive (E2: 67.8% (95% CI 58.9-75.6%); E7: 67.0% (95% CI 63.2-70.6%)). Subgroup analyses revealed increased pooled sensitivity for bacterially (89.9% (95% CI 84.5-93.6%)) vs. in vitro expressed E6 antigen (55.3% (95% CI 41.0-68.7%)), while both showed high specificity (95.2% (95% CI 93.0-96.7%) and 91.1% (95% CI 46.6-99.2%), respectively). Pooled specificity estimates for HPV16 E2, E6 and E7 serology were significantly lower in studies utilizing HPV DNA PCR as the only molecular reference method compared to those using a combination of any two reference methods (HPV DNA, RNA, in situ hybridization (ISH), p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC)), or histopathological reference methods (ISH or p16 IHC) as stand-alone marker. In conclusion, HPV16 E6 seropositivity is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for HPV-OPC. However, its performance differs between serological assays and depends on molecular reference methods.
Keyword(s): HPV ; antibodies ; meta-analysis ; oropharyngeal cancer ; sensitivity ; serology ; specificity ; systematic review
; 
; 
; Article Processing Charges ; BIOSIS Previews ; Biological Abstracts ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; DOAJ Seal ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; Fees ; IF >= 5 ; JCR ; PubMed Central ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
|
The record appears in these collections: |
