001     178653
005     20240229143552.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4fa0
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:35086066
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0031-9155
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1361-6560
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2022-00182
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 530
100 1 _ |a Holm, Kim Marina
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Direct determination ofkQfor Farmer-type ionization chambers in a clinical scanned carbon-ion beam using water calorimetry.
260 _ _ |a Bristol
|c 2022
|b IOP Publ.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1648039446_1485
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a Phys. Med. Biol. 67 (2022) 049401
520 _ _ |a Within two studies, kQ factors for two Farmer-type ionization chambers have been experimentally determined by means of water calorimetry in the entrance channel (EC) of a monoenergetic carbon-ion beam [1] and for a passively modulated spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) [2]. Both studies were performed at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) using the PTB portable water calorimeter but applying different initial beam energies of 429 MeV/u for the EC and 278 MeV/u for the SOBP as well as different scanning patterns of the irradiated eld. Comparing their results revealed differences between the experimental kQ factors of up to 1.9% between the EC and the SOBP. To further investigate this unexpected difference, we performed additional kQ determinations for the EC of an 278 MeV/u monoenergetic carbon-ion beam and reevaluated the original data of Osinga-Blättermann et al. [1]. This new experimental data indicated no difference between the kQ factors for the EC and the SOBP and the reevaluation led to a substantial reduction of the originally published kQ factors for the EC of the 429 MeV/u beam [1]. Finally, no signicant difference between the data for the EC and the data for the SOBP can be found within the standard measurement uncertainty of experimental kQ factors of 0.8 %. The results presented here are intended to correct and replace the kQ data published by Osinga- Blättermann et al. [1] and in Osinga-Blättermann and Krauss [3].
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo01.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de
650 _ 7 |a SOBP
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a carbon-ion beams
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a entrance channel
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a kQ factors
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a water calorimetry
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Jaekel, Oliver
|0 0000-0002-6056-9747
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Krauss, Achim
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4fa0
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1473501-5
|n 4
|p 049401
|t Physics in medicine and biology
|v 67
|y 2022
|x 0031-9155
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:178653
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 0000-0002-6056-9747
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-28
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PHYS MED BIOL : 2021
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331
|k E040
|l E040 Med. Physik in der Strahlentherapie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21