001     265117
005     20240229162313.0
024 7 _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.122.264338
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:35981898
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0097-9058
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0022-3123
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0161-5505
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1535-5667
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2159-662X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a altmetric:134755441
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2023-00279
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Kersting, David
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Lesion Quantification Accuracy of Digital 90Y PET Imaging in the Context of Dosimetry in Systemic Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor Radionuclide Therapy.
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2023
|b Soc.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1675679895_31407
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Therapy with 90Y-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (90Y-FAPIs) was recently introduced as a novel treatment concept for patients with solid tumors. Lesion and organ-at-risk dosimetry is part of assessing treatment efficacy and safety and requires reliable quantification of tissue uptake. As 90Y quantification is limited by the low internal positron-electron pair conversion rate, the increased effective sensitivity of digital silicon photomultiplier-based PET/CT systems might increase quantification accuracy and, consequently, allow for dosimetry in 90Y-FAPI therapy. The aim of this study was to explore the conditions for reliable lesion image quantification in 90Y-FAPI radionuclide therapy using a digital PET/CT system. Methods: Two tumor phantoms were filled with 90Y solution using different sphere activity concentrations and a constant signal-to-background ratio of 40. The minimum detectable activity concentration was determined, and its dependence on acquisition time (15 vs. 30 min per bed position) and smoothing levels (all-pass vs. 5-mm gaussian filter) was investigated. Quantification accuracy was evaluated at various activity concentrations to estimate the minimum quantifiable activity concentration using contour-based and oversized volume-of-interest-based quantification approaches. A ±20% deviation range between image-derived and true activity concentrations was regarded as acceptable. Tumor dosimetry for 3 patients treated with 90Y-FAPI is presented to project the phantom results to clinical scenarios. Results: For a lesion size of 40 mm and a clinical acquisition time of 15 min, both minimum detectable and minimum quantifiable activity concentrations were 0.12 MBq/mL. For lesion sizes of greater than or equal to 30 mm, accurate quantification was feasible for detectable lesions. Only for the smallest 10-mm sphere, the minimum detectable and minimum quantifiable activity concentrations differ substantially (0.43 vs. 1.97 MBq/mL). No notable differences between the 2 quantification approaches were observed. For the investigated tumors, absorbed dose estimates with reliable accuracy were achievable. Conclusion: For lesion sizes and activity concentrations that are expected to be observed in patients treated with 90Y-FAPI, quantification with reasonable accuracy is possible. Further dosimetry studies are needed to thoroughly investigate the efficacy and safety of 90Y-FAPI therapy.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|c POF4-899
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a 90Y
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a FAPI therapy
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a PET
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a minimum detectable activity
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a quantification accuracy
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Yttrium Radioisotopes
|2 NLM Chemicals
650 _ 7 |a Gallium Radioisotopes
|2 NLM Chemicals
650 _ 2 |a Humans
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Yttrium Radioisotopes: therapeutic use
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Positron-Emission Tomography: methods
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Neoplasms: diagnostic imaging
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Neoplasms: radiotherapy
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Neoplasms: drug therapy
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Fibroblasts
|2 MeSH
650 _ 2 |a Gallium Radioisotopes
|2 MeSH
700 1 _ |a Jentzen, Walter
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Jeromin, Daniel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Mavroeidi, Ilektra-Antonia
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Conti, Maurizio
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Büther, Florian
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Herrmann, Ken
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Rischpler, Christoph
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Hamacher, Rainer
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Fendler, Wolfgang P
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Seifert, Robert
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Costa, Pedro Fragoso
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
773 _ _ |a 10.2967/jnumed.122.264338
|g Vol. 64, no. 2, p. 329 - 336
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2040222-3
|n 2
|p 329 - 336
|t Journal of nuclear medicine
|v 64
|y 2023
|x 0097-9058
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:265117
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 11
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2022-11-19
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-19
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-19
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2022
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2023-10-24
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J NUCL MED : 2022
|d 2023-10-24
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331
|k ED01
|l DKTK ED ES zentral
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)ED01-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21