Journal Article DKFZ-2023-00279

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Lesion Quantification Accuracy of Digital 90Y PET Imaging in the Context of Dosimetry in Systemic Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor Radionuclide Therapy.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2023
Soc. New York, NY

Journal of nuclear medicine 64(2), 329 - 336 () [10.2967/jnumed.122.264338]
 GO

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Therapy with 90Y-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (90Y-FAPIs) was recently introduced as a novel treatment concept for patients with solid tumors. Lesion and organ-at-risk dosimetry is part of assessing treatment efficacy and safety and requires reliable quantification of tissue uptake. As 90Y quantification is limited by the low internal positron-electron pair conversion rate, the increased effective sensitivity of digital silicon photomultiplier-based PET/CT systems might increase quantification accuracy and, consequently, allow for dosimetry in 90Y-FAPI therapy. The aim of this study was to explore the conditions for reliable lesion image quantification in 90Y-FAPI radionuclide therapy using a digital PET/CT system. Methods: Two tumor phantoms were filled with 90Y solution using different sphere activity concentrations and a constant signal-to-background ratio of 40. The minimum detectable activity concentration was determined, and its dependence on acquisition time (15 vs. 30 min per bed position) and smoothing levels (all-pass vs. 5-mm gaussian filter) was investigated. Quantification accuracy was evaluated at various activity concentrations to estimate the minimum quantifiable activity concentration using contour-based and oversized volume-of-interest-based quantification approaches. A ±20% deviation range between image-derived and true activity concentrations was regarded as acceptable. Tumor dosimetry for 3 patients treated with 90Y-FAPI is presented to project the phantom results to clinical scenarios. Results: For a lesion size of 40 mm and a clinical acquisition time of 15 min, both minimum detectable and minimum quantifiable activity concentrations were 0.12 MBq/mL. For lesion sizes of greater than or equal to 30 mm, accurate quantification was feasible for detectable lesions. Only for the smallest 10-mm sphere, the minimum detectable and minimum quantifiable activity concentrations differ substantially (0.43 vs. 1.97 MBq/mL). No notable differences between the 2 quantification approaches were observed. For the investigated tumors, absorbed dose estimates with reliable accuracy were achievable. Conclusion: For lesion sizes and activity concentrations that are expected to be observed in patients treated with 90Y-FAPI, quantification with reasonable accuracy is possible. Further dosimetry studies are needed to thoroughly investigate the efficacy and safety of 90Y-FAPI therapy.

Keyword(s): Humans (MeSH) ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography (MeSH) ; Yttrium Radioisotopes: therapeutic use (MeSH) ; Positron-Emission Tomography: methods (MeSH) ; Neoplasms: diagnostic imaging (MeSH) ; Neoplasms: radiotherapy (MeSH) ; Neoplasms: drug therapy (MeSH) ; Fibroblasts (MeSH) ; Gallium Radioisotopes (MeSH) ; 90Y ; FAPI therapy ; PET ; minimum detectable activity ; quantification accuracy ; Yttrium Radioisotopes ; Gallium Radioisotopes

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. DKTK ED ES zentral (ED01)
Research Program(s):
  1. 899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899) (POF4-899)

Appears in the scientific report 2023
Database coverage:
Medline ; BIOSIS Previews ; Biological Abstracts ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Current Contents - Life Sciences ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF >= 5 ; JCR ; PubMed Central ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2023-02-06, last modified 2024-02-29



Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)