001     290057
005     20250825120146.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100581
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:38711920
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a pmc:PMC11070926
|2 pmc
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2024-00962
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Glowa, Christin
|0 P:(DE-He78)06ec1253cfc102aebeeb536a65133370
|b 0
|e First author
|u dkfz
245 _ _ |a Relative biological effectiveness of oxygen ion beams in the rat spinal cord: Dependence on linear energy transfer and dose and comparison with model predictions.
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u. a.]
|c 2024
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1715088210_19504
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a EA:E040#LA:E040#
520 _ _ |a Ion beams exhibit an increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) with respect to photons. This study determined the RBE of oxygen ion beams as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and dose in the rat spinal cord.The spinal cord of rats was irradiated at four different positions of a 6 cm spread-out Bragg-peak (LET: 26, 66, 98 and 141 keV/µm) using increasing levels of single and split oxygen ion doses. Dose-response curves were established for the endpoint paresis grade II and based on ED50 (dose at 50 % effect probability), the RBE was determined and compared to model predictions.When LET increased from 26 to 98 keV/µm, ED50 decreased from 17.2 ± 0.3 Gy to 13.5 ± 0.4 Gy for single and from 21.7 ± 0.4 Gy to 15.5 ± 0.5 Gy for split doses, however, at 141 keV/µm, ED50 rose again to 15.8 ± 0.4 Gy and 17.2 ± 0.4 Gy, respectively. As a result, the RBE increased from 1.43 ± 0.05 to 1.82 ± 0.08 (single dose) and from 1.58 ± 0.04 to 2.21 ± 0.08 (split dose), respectively, before declining again to 1.56 ± 0.06 for single and 1.99 ± 0.06 for split doses at the highest LET. Deviations from RBE-predictions were model-dependent.This study established first RBE data for the late reacting central nervous system after single and split doses of oxygen ions. The data was used to validate the RBE-dependence on LET and dose of three RBE-models. This study extends the existing data base for protons, helium and carbon ions and provides important information for future patient treatments with oxygen ions.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a Late normal tissue effects
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Linear energy transfer (LET)
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Local effect model (LEM)
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM)
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Myelopathy
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Oxygen ion radiotherapy
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Rat spinal cord
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a Relative biological effectiveness (RBE)
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Saager, Maria
|0 P:(DE-He78)132c557ecfe3de184432e5ac8a9c7308
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Hintz, Lisa
|0 P:(DE-He78)6e765266561c869659589500555d49c4
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Euler-Lange, Rosemarie
|0 P:(DE-He78)f628d9e6d7787963743903d31510bbad
|b 3
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Peschke, Peter
|0 P:(DE-He78)1bf5666dbe17c0fd5e81301c52f6347a
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Brons, Stephan
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Scholz, Michael
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Mein, Stewart
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Mairani, Andrea
|0 P:(DE-He78)8d6c2aceda79e88defe1e8c0fcc39d59
|b 8
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Karger, Christian
|0 P:(DE-He78)b43076fb0a30230e4323887c0c980046
|b 9
|e Last author
|u dkfz
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100581
|g Vol. 30, p. 100581 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2963795-8
|p 100581
|t Physics & Imaging in Radiation Oncology
|v 30
|y 2024
|x 2405-6316
856 4 _ |u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/290057/files/1-s2.0-S2405631624000514-main.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/290057/files/1-s2.0-S2405631624000514-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
909 C O |o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:290057
|p VDB
|p OpenAPC
|p openCost
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)06ec1253cfc102aebeeb536a65133370
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-He78)132c557ecfe3de184432e5ac8a9c7308
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-He78)6e765266561c869659589500555d49c4
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-He78)f628d9e6d7787963743903d31510bbad
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)1bf5666dbe17c0fd5e81301c52f6347a
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 8
|6 P:(DE-He78)8d6c2aceda79e88defe1e8c0fcc39d59
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 9
|6 P:(DE-He78)b43076fb0a30230e4323887c0c980046
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2024
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PHYS IMAG RADIAT ONC : 2022
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2023-05-02T08:51:39Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2023-05-02T08:51:39Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2023-05-02T08:51:39Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112
|2 StatID
|b Emerging Sources Citation Index
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-25
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-25
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a Local Funding
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
915 p c |a DEAL: Elsevier 09/01/2023
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0125
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
920 2 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331
|k E040
|l E040 Med. Physik in der Strahlentherapie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331
|k E040
|l E040 Med. Physik in der Strahlentherapie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E220-20160331
|k E220
|l E220 Radioonkologie Radiobiologie
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E210-20160331
|k E210
|l E210 KKE Translationale Radioonkologie
|x 2
920 0 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331
|k E040
|l E040 Med. Physik in der Strahlentherapie
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E040-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E220-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E210-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a APC


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21