Home > Publications database > Influence of field strength on quantitative parameters and feature stability in the assessment of the ovaries using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. > print

001     298578
005     20250415151210.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1177/02841851241313021
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:39905712
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0567-8056
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0284-1851
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0001-6926
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 0365-5954
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1600-0455
|2 ISSN
037 _ _ |a DKFZ-2025-00295
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Mokry, Theresa
|0 P:(DE-He78)bb99ed05244bff1747c47fc8a34c1795
|b 0
|e First author
|u dkfz
245 _ _ |a Influence of field strength on quantitative parameters and feature stability in the assessment of the ovaries using 1.5-T and 3-T MRI.
260 _ _ |a London
|c 2025
|b Sage
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1744722695_5439
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a 2025 May;66(5):512-520
520 _ _ |a Little is known of the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusivity variables, especially kurtosis in healthy ovaries.To evaluate the influence of scanner field strength on quantitative diffusion variables in pelvic MRI of the ovaries.This prospective, single-centre study consisted of repeated 1.5-T and 3-T examinations in 30 female volunteers (mean age=27.9 years, age range=20.3-45.2 years) from July 2017 to September 2019. Multi b-value DWI 0, 50, 100, 800, 1500, 2000 s/mm2 was acquired over three timepoints during the menstrual cycle. Ovaries were segmented at b = 1500 s/mm2. Median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and advanced kurtosis parameters Dapp and Kapp were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed with the variations of diffusivity variables being compared between 1.5-T and 3-T MRI using a Mann-Whitney rank-sum test.Median ADC and Dapp (µm²/ms) did not statistically differ. Median ADC were 1.509 (range=1.371-1.610), 1.619 (range=1.463-1.747), and 1.511 (range=1.423-1.639) at 1.5 T; 1.542 (range=1.428-1.682), 1.658 (range=1.510-1.806), and 1.572 (range=1.455-1.709) at 3 T (P = 0.14, 0.19, and 0.07), whereas median Dapp were 2.024 (range=1.913-2.152), 2.192 (range=2.010-2.327), and 2.045 (range=1.958-2.170) at 1.5 T; 2.013 (range=1.952-2.188), 2.179 (range=2.018-2.327), and 2.082 (range=1.959-2.194) at 3 T (P = 0.77, 0.99, and 0.34) for timepoints 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Statistical comparison of Kapp revealed significant differences for all timepoints: 0.629 (range=0.595-0.652), 0.604 (range=0.574-0.651), and 0.622 (range=0.581-0.664) at 1.5 T; 0.601 (range=0.563-0.626), 0.567 (range=0.526-0.633), and 0.599 (range=0.541-0.650) at 3 T (P < 0.001, 0.005, and 0.03).Diffusivity mapping in the ovaries provides similar absolute median diffusion values, but statistically significant differences in absolute kurtosis values between 1.5 T and 3 T.
536 _ _ |a 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|c POF4-315
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
650 _ 7 |a Genital
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a adults
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a magnetic resonance diffusion/perfusion
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a ovaries
|2 Other
650 _ 7 |a reproductive
|2 Other
700 1 _ |a Pantke, Judith
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Laun, Frederik B
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
|0 P:(DE-He78)3d04c8fee58c9ab71f62ff80d06b6fec
|b 4
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Kuder, Tristan Anselm
|0 P:(DE-He78)59dfdd0ee0a7f0db81535f0781a3a6d6
|b 5
|u dkfz
700 1 _ |a Bickelhaupt, Sebastian
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.1177/02841851241313021
|g p. 02841851241313021
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2024579-8
|n 5
|p 512-520
|t Acta radiologica
|v 66
|y 2025
|x 0567-8056
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:298578
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-He78)bb99ed05244bff1747c47fc8a34c1795
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-He78)3d04c8fee58c9ab71f62ff80d06b6fec
910 1 _ |a Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum
|0 I:(DE-588b)2036810-0
|k DKFZ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-He78)59dfdd0ee0a7f0db81535f0781a3a6d6
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Krebsforschung
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Bildgebung und Radioonkologie
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2025
915 _ _ |a National-Konsortium
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-20
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ACTA RADIOL : 2022
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2024-12-20
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2024-12-20
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
|k E010
|l E010 Radiologie
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
|k E020
|l E020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E010-20160331
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21