000299552 001__ 299552
000299552 005__ 20250411110550.0
000299552 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.mri.2025.110368
000299552 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:40049254
000299552 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0730-725X
000299552 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-5894
000299552 037__ $$aDKFZ-2025-00496
000299552 041__ $$aEnglish
000299552 082__ $$a610
000299552 1001_ $$aDaud, Elias$$b0
000299552 245__ $$aAssessing reliability and comparability of 4D flow CMR whole heart measurements using retrospective valve tracking: A single-vendor study in the Berlin research network.
000299552 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2025
000299552 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000299552 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000299552 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1744362315_27546
000299552 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000299552 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000299552 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000299552 500__ $$aVolume 119, June 2025, 110368
000299552 520__ $$aThis study investigated intracardiac flow dynamics and assessed the comparability and reliability of 4D flow CMR measurements across multiple sites within the Berlin Research Network for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (BER-CMR) using 3D cine phase-contrast imaging with three-directional velocity encoding in a healthy traveling cohort.In a prospective multi-site cohort study, 20 healthy volunteers underwent CMR at different sites. Quantitative assessment of Forward flow Volume (FFV), Peak (PV) and Mean Velocity (MV) across the heart's valves were conducted using retrospective valve tracking. FFV of the aortic and pulmonary valves, measured via 4D flow CMR, was compared to each other and to Stroke Volume (SV) from cine imaging. Reliability was assessed using scan-rescan tolerance ranges from a single site, with equivalency assumed if other sites' confidence intervals fell within these ranges. Intra- and interobserver analyses evaluated measurement consistency.The final analysis included 19 healthy volunteers. Intersite comparability analysis across all four heart valves revealed a strong reliability for FFV, PV and MV, except for FFV at the mitral valve at two sites and PV at the tricuspid valve at one site. Correlation analysis of SV and FFV of the corresponding ventriculoarterial valves demonstrated good agreement (aortic valve: r = 0.89, P < 0.001; pulmonary valve: r = 0.88, p < 0.001). Inter- and intraobserver analyses yielded good to excellent agreement across all valves (ICC > 0.90, p < 0.001).4D flow CMR whole-heart measurements in healthy volunteers were consistent across sites, showing strong agreement despite physiological and technical variability. These findings support future multicenter studies.
000299552 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$a315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)$$cPOF4-315$$fPOF IV$$x0
000299552 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000299552 650_7 $$2Other$$a4D flow CMR
000299552 650_7 $$2Other$$aCardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging
000299552 650_7 $$2Other$$aHealthy volunteers
000299552 650_7 $$2Other$$aReliability
000299552 7001_ $$aTrauzeddel, Ralf Felix$$b1
000299552 7001_ $$aMüller, Maximilian$$b2
000299552 7001_ $$aVestjens, Luc T W$$b3
000299552 7001_ $$aGröschel, Jan$$b4
000299552 7001_ $$aViezzer, Darian$$b5
000299552 7001_ $$aHadler, Thomas$$b6
000299552 7001_ $$aBlaszczyk, Edyta$$b7
000299552 7001_ $$aJin, Ning$$b8
000299552 7001_ $$aGiese, Daniel$$b9
000299552 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)19e2d877276b0e5eec11cdfc1789a55e$$aSchmitter, Sebastian$$b10$$udkfz
000299552 7001_ $$aSchulz-Menger, Jeanette$$b11
000299552 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1500646-3$$a10.1016/j.mri.2025.110368$$gp. 110368 -$$p110368$$tMagnetic resonance imaging$$v119$$x0730-725X$$y2025
000299552 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:299552$$pVDB
000299552 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)19e2d877276b0e5eec11cdfc1789a55e$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b10$$kDKFZ
000299552 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vBildgebung und Radioonkologie$$x0
000299552 9141_ $$y2025
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2024-12-20$$wger
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bMAGN RESON IMAGING : 2022$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2024-12-20
000299552 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2024-12-20
000299552 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331$$kE020$$lE020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie$$x0
000299552 980__ $$ajournal
000299552 980__ $$aVDB
000299552 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
000299552 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED