000299798 001__ 299798
000299798 005__ 20250606144531.0
000299798 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/mrm.30495
000299798 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:40079582
000299798 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1522-2594
000299798 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0740-3194
000299798 037__ $$aDKFZ-2025-00553
000299798 041__ $$aEnglish
000299798 082__ $$a610
000299798 1001_ $$aSánchez Alarcón, Manuel Fernando$$b0
000299798 245__ $$aReproducibility of tailored and universal nonselective excitation pulses at 7 T for human cardiac MRI: A 3-year and an interday study.
000299798 260__ $$aNew York, NY [u.a.]$$bWiley-Liss$$c2025
000299798 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000299798 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000299798 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1749213897_349
000299798 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000299798 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000299798 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000299798 500__ $$a2025 Aug;94(2):588-601
000299798 520__ $$aUltrahigh-field (UHF; ≥7 T) MRI is challenging due to spatially heterogeneous B1 + profiles. This longitudinal study evaluates the reproducibility of three parallel-transmission excitation strategies to enable UHF cardiac MRI: vendor-supplied radiofrequency (RF) shim, subject-tailored kT-points pulses (TPs), and universal kT-points pulses (UPs).Six healthy subjects underwent 7 T MRI scans performed by different MR operators using a 32-element parallel-transmission body array at four time points over 3 years. A single UP was computed and applied to all subjects. TPs were computed individually for each scan and organized into four configurations. Each configuration was applied to all scans from each subject to analyze intrasubject variability. Reproducibility was assessed by comparing the coefficient of variation (CV) of simulated flip angles (FAs) within the heart volume across scan sessions.TPs designed for a specific scan session yielded lower CVs (2-fold reduction) than UP. Applying TPs to other scan sessions of the same subject, however, resulted in approximately 40% higher CVs and lower FA uniformity compared with the UP. On average, the UP consistently achieved the most reproducible results across inter-year, inter-day, and same-operator studies, with CVs of approximately 12%.Although TPs showed advantages when tailored for a specific target volume, they struggled with long-term consistency and required lengthy calibration. The precomputed UP kT-points pulses proved to be the most consistent across all scans acquired in the 3 years by different operators, minimizing CV-data dispersion and maintaining FA uniformity.
000299798 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$a315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)$$cPOF4-315$$fPOF IV$$x0
000299798 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000299798 650_7 $$2Other$$a7 Tesla
000299798 650_7 $$2Other$$acardiac MRI
000299798 650_7 $$2Other$$aparallel transmission
000299798 650_7 $$2Other$$auniversal pulse
000299798 7001_ $$aDietrich-Conzelmann, Sebastian$$b1
000299798 7001_ $$aBassenge, Jean Pierre$$b2
000299798 7001_ $$00000-0003-3100-1092$$aSchulz-Menger, Jeanette$$b3
000299798 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)19e2d877276b0e5eec11cdfc1789a55e$$aSchmitter, Sebastian$$b4$$udkfz
000299798 7001_ $$00000-0003-3618-9610$$aAigner, Christoph Stefan$$b5
000299798 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1493786-4$$a10.1002/mrm.30495$$gp. mrm.30495$$n2$$p588-601$$tMagnetic resonance in medicine$$v94$$x1522-2594$$y2025
000299798 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:299798$$pVDB
000299798 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)19e2d877276b0e5eec11cdfc1789a55e$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b4$$kDKFZ
000299798 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vBildgebung und Radioonkologie$$x0
000299798 9141_ $$y2025
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2025-01-02$$wger
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3001$$2StatID$$aDEAL Wiley$$d2025-01-02$$wger
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2025-01-02
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2025-01-02
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2025-01-02
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2025-01-02
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2025-01-02
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2025-01-02
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2025-01-02
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2025-01-02
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2025-01-02
000299798 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2025-01-02
000299798 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331$$kE020$$lE020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie$$x0
000299798 980__ $$ajournal
000299798 980__ $$aVDB
000299798 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
000299798 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED