% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ruiz:301290,
author = {F. Ruiz and R. Rispoli and Z. Jaunmuktane and A. Merve and
L. D'Antona and M. Dutt and F. Sahm$^*$ and S. Brandner},
title = {{T}esting {M}eningiomas {W}ith {M}ethylation {A}rrays:
{I}nsights and {R}ecommendations {F}rom a {L}arge
{S}ingle-{C}entre {S}tudy.},
journal = {Neuropathology $\&$ applied neurobiology},
volume = {51},
number = {3},
issn = {0305-1846},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {DKFZ-2025-00974},
pages = {e70018},
year = {2025},
abstract = {Meningiomas are common primary CNS tumours, and their
morphological diagnosis is usually straightforward. Their
histological grading according to CNS WHO criteria alone
provides limited information on recurrence risk. Risk
stratification of meningiomas combining WHO grade,
methylation class and copy number profile improves
prediction of the risk of early recurrence. Because of the
frequency of meningiomas in diagnostic practice, applying
this prediction algorithm to all meningiomas is financially
not viable in most healthcare systems.We analysed a
retrospective dataset of over 1000 meningiomas from a single
centre with methylation arrays to provide guidance on which
meningiomas to prioritise for integrated molecular testing
and to understand how WHO grades resolve into risk
strata.Approximately $90\%$ of CNS WHO Grade 1 meningiomas
were allocated into the methylation class 'benign' and also
into a low-risk group. Grade 2 meningiomas were allocated
almost equally to either the low-risk $(39\%)$ or
intermediate-risk groups $(46\%)$ but occasionally also to
the high-risk group $(15\%).$ All grading criteria for CNS
WHO Grade 2 meningiomas (brain invasion, mitotic count,
cytoarchitectural atypia and histological type) showed a
similar risk score distribution as the entire group. Grade 3
meningiomas were allocated to intermediate- $(26\%)$ or
high-risk groups $(74\%).Our$ data suggest that Grade 2 and
3 meningiomas should be prioritised for methylation
profiling. A small proportion of Grade 1 meningiomas may
also benefit from integrated molecular analysis, and further
research is needed to explore if those histologically benign
meningiomas with a predicted increased recurrence risk are
associated with distinct demographic or histological
characteristics.},
keywords = {Humans / Meningioma: genetics / Meningioma: pathology /
Meningioma: diagnosis / Meningeal Neoplasms: genetics /
Meningeal Neoplasms: pathology / Meningeal Neoplasms:
diagnosis / Female / Male / DNA Methylation / Retrospective
Studies / Middle Aged / Aged / Adult / Neoplasm Grading /
Aged, 80 and over / CNS WHO grading (Other) / meningioma
(Other) / methylation array (Other) / model score (Other) /
prognostication (Other)},
cin = {B300 / HD01},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-He78)B300-20160331 / I:(DE-He78)HD01-20160331},
pnm = {312 - Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung
(POF4-312)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-312},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:40356449},
doi = {10.1111/nan.70018},
url = {https://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/301290},
}