000306665 001__ 306665
000306665 005__ 20260213120746.0
000306665 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/mrm.70208
000306665 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:41310405
000306665 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1522-2594
000306665 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0740-3194
000306665 037__ $$aDKFZ-2025-02658
000306665 041__ $$aEnglish
000306665 082__ $$a610
000306665 1001_ $$aMöller, Rika$$b0
000306665 245__ $$aEvaluation of Partial Volume Correction Techniques for Sodium MRI of the Achilles Tendon.
000306665 260__ $$aNew York, NY [u.a.]$$bWiley-Liss$$c2026
000306665 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000306665 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000306665 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1769695705_582550
000306665 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000306665 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000306665 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000306665 500__ $$a2026 Apr;95(4):2180-2193
000306665 520__ $$aTo evaluate partial volume correction (PVC) techniques for sodium MRI of the Achilles tendon in situ and in vivo.Five PVC methods were evaluated including a volume ratio of the proton and sodium segmentations (PSSR), a modified least trimmed square (3D-mLTS) linear regression, a geometric transfer matrix (GTM) approach, a single target correction (STC), and a novel estimated single target correction (eSTC). Their performance was tested using simulated data and 3 T MR data of two volunteers' Achilles tendons acquired at different resolutions: 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.5 mm3. Since there was no in vivo ground truth, the highest-resolution apparent tissue sodium contents (aTSC) were used.In the simulation, all PVC methods reduced the difference between the actual and calculated concentrations and were 11.69 ± 6.17 mM without PVC, 4.90 ± 5.40 mM with the PSSR, 4.86 ± 5.19 mM with the mLTS, 1.72 ± 4.13 mM with the GTM, 0.36 ± 1.77 mM with STC and 0.26 ± 1.63 mM with the eSTC. In vivo, the difference in aTSCs between the lower and the highest resolution decreased with all PVCs ranging from 3.6 to 38.8 mM without PVC, 2.8-20.4 mM with PSSR, 4.5-25.9 mM with mLTS, 0.9-7.8 mM with GTM, 0.1-23.8 mM with STC, and 0.7-7.7 mM with eSTC.PVC generally improved the accuracy of aTSC calculations. The newly introduced eSTC produced the most accurate results for the Achilles tendon.
000306665 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$a315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315)$$cPOF4-315$$fPOF IV$$x0
000306665 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed, , Journals: inrepo02.dkfz.de
000306665 650_7 $$2Other$$a23Na‐MRI
000306665 650_7 $$2Other$$aAchilles tendon
000306665 650_7 $$2Other$$apartial volume correction
000306665 650_7 $$2Other$$asodium MRI
000306665 650_7 $$2Other$$asodium concentration
000306665 7001_ $$00000-0002-0518-5695$$aKamp, Benedikt$$b1
000306665 7001_ $$aLeja, Paula$$b2
000306665 7001_ $$aThiel, Thomas A$$b3
000306665 7001_ $$00000-0001-8864-4879$$aBechler, Eric$$b4
000306665 7001_ $$00000-0002-5830-423X$$aWittsack, Hans-Jörg$$b5
000306665 7001_ $$aAntoch, Gerald$$b6
000306665 7001_ $$0P:(DE-He78)054fd7a5195b75b11fbdc5c360276011$$aNagel, Armin$$b7$$udkfz
000306665 7001_ $$aWilms, Lena M$$b8
000306665 7001_ $$aFrenken, Miriam$$b9
000306665 7001_ $$aMüller-Lutz, Anja$$b10
000306665 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1493786-4$$a10.1002/mrm.70208$$gp. mrm.70208$$n4$$p2180-2193$$tMagnetic resonance in medicine$$v95$$x1522-2594$$y2026
000306665 8564_ $$uhttps://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/306665/files/Magnetic%20Resonance%20in%20Med%20-%202025%20-%20M%C3%B6ller%20-%20Evaluation%20of%20Partial%20Volume%20Correction%20Techniques%20for%20Sodium%20MRI%20of%20the.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000306665 8564_ $$uhttps://inrepo02.dkfz.de/record/306665/files/Magnetic%20Resonance%20in%20Med%20-%202025%20-%20M%C3%B6ller%20-%20Evaluation%20of%20Partial%20Volume%20Correction%20Techniques%20for%20Sodium%20MRI%20of%20the.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000306665 909CO $$ooai:inrepo02.dkfz.de:306665$$popenaire$$popen_access$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pdnbdelivery
000306665 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)2036810-0$$6P:(DE-He78)054fd7a5195b75b11fbdc5c360276011$$aDeutsches Krebsforschungszentrum$$b7$$kDKFZ
000306665 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-315$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-310$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-300$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bGesundheit$$lKrebsforschung$$vBildgebung und Radioonkologie$$x0
000306665 9141_ $$y2025
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2025-01-02
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2025-01-02
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2025-01-02
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2025-01-02
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3001$$2StatID$$aDEAL Wiley$$d2025-01-02$$wger
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2025-01-02
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2025-01-02
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2025-01-02
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2025-01-02
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2025-01-02
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2025-01-02$$wger
000306665 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2025-01-02
000306665 9201_ $$0I:(DE-He78)E020-20160331$$kE020$$lE020 Med. Physik in der Radiologie$$x0
000306665 980__ $$ajournal
000306665 980__ $$aVDB
000306665 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000306665 980__ $$aI:(DE-He78)E020-20160331
000306665 9801_ $$aFullTexts