| Home > Publications database > Introducing Key Performance Metrics for Assessing the Benefits and Harm of the Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathway. |
| Journal Article | DKFZ-2026-00631 |
; ; ;
2026
Elsevier
Amsterdam
Abstract: Traditional accuracy metrics no longer suffice for comparing diagnostic pathways for prostate cancer; new comparative performance metrics are needed that prioritize the overall benefit-to-harm ratio. Key performance metrics, such as biopsy efficiency, biopsy (grade) selectivity, and biopsy avoidance safety, enable meaningful patient-level comparisons across studies. Standardized benefit-to-harm metrics reporting enhances quality assurance, informs personalized diagnostics, and supports integration into clinical guidelines to improve the safety of prostate cancer diagnosis.
Keyword(s): Biopsy ; Endpoints ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Outcome measures ; Prostate cancer
|
The record appears in these collections: |