Journal Article DKFZ-2024-01372

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Targeted agents in patients with progressive glioblastoma—A systematic meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2024
Wiley Hoboken, NJ

Cancer medicine 13(12), e7362 () [10.1002/cam4.7362]
 GO

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Background:Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults and is associated with a poor prognosis. Current treatment guidelines outline the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed GB; however, there is currently no well-established consensus for the treatment of progressive GB. With this systematic meta-analysis of recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we aim to establish evidence on targeted agents in the treatment of patients with progressive GB.Material and Methods:We conducted searches across the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, MEDLINE (Ovid), ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO‘s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Google Scholar, encompassing the time span from 1954 to 2022, aiming to identify RCTs evaluating targeted therapies in patients with progressive GB. In order to perform a random-effects meta-analysis, we extracted hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Results:We included 16 RCTs (n = 3025 patients) in the systematic meta-analysis. Formally, regorafenib (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.33–0.75), Depatux-M + TMZ (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.47–0.93) and rindopepimut + bevacizumab (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.32–0.88) were associated with an improved OS compared to the control arm. The combination of bevacizumab + CCNU (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.35–0.69) and regorafenib (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.44–0.95) were formally associated with improved PFS.Conclusions:The aim of this systematic meta-analysis was to establish evidence for the use of targeted therapies in progressive GB. While some studies demonstrated benefits for OS and/or PFS, those results have to be interpreted with caution as most studies had major methodological weaknesses, including potential differences in sample size, trial design, or the initial distribution of prognostic factors.

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. KKE Neuroonkologie (B320)
  2. DKTK HD zentral (HD01)
Research Program(s):
  1. 312 - Funktionelle und strukturelle Genomforschung (POF4-312) (POF4-312)

Appears in the scientific report 2024
Database coverage:
Medline ; Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version) ; DOAJ ; Article Processing Charges ; BIOSIS Previews ; Biological Abstracts ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; DOAJ Seal ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; Fees ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; PubMed Central ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2024-06-28, last modified 2025-05-14


Fulltext:
Download fulltext PDF Download fulltext PDF (PDFA)
Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)