Journal Article DKFZ-2025-00033

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Professional-patient discrepancies in assessing lung cancer radiotherapy symptoms: An international multicentre study.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2025
Elsevier Amsterdam [u.a.]

Lung cancer 199, 108072 () [10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.108072]
 GO

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: We investigate discrepancies in the assessment of treatment-related symptoms in lung cancer between healthcare professionals and patients, and factors contributing to these discrepancies.Data from 515 participants in the REQUITE study were analysed. Five symptoms (cough, dyspnoea, bronchopulmonary haemorrhage, chest wall pain, dysphagia) were evaluated both before and after radiotherapy. Agreement between healthcare professionals and people with lung cancer was quantified using Gwet's-AC2 coefficient. The influence of clinical variables, comorbidities, and quality-of-life outcomes on agreement was examined through stratified analyses.We found varying levels of agreement between healthcare professionals and people with lung cancer. Bronchopulmonary haemorrhage and dysphagia exhibited very good agreement (meanAC2 > 0.81), while cough and chest wall pain showed substantial agreement (meanAC2 = 0.64 and 0.76, respectively). Dyspnoea had the lowest agreement (meanAC2 = 0.59), with prior chemotherapy significantly reducing agreement levels. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and early cancer stages also contributed to discrepancies in dyspnoea assessments. Regarding quality-of-life, the most relevant factor was fatigue, which reduced agreement in the assessment of dyspnoea (AC2 = 0.55 vs 0.70), dysphagia (AC2 = 0.48 vs 0.69), cough (AC2 = 0.58 vs 0.82), and chest wall pain (AC2 = 0.77 vs 0.91).Our findings indicate strong alignment between healthcare professionals' and people with lung cancer evaluations of observable treatment-related symptoms, but less consistency for subjective symptoms such as dyspnoea. Factors such as prior chemotherapy, COPD, and cancer stage should be considered when interpreting symptom assessments. Furthermore, our study underscores the importance of integrating quality-of-life considerations, particularly fatigue, into symptom evaluations to mitigate potential biases in symptom perception.

Keyword(s): Correlation measures ; Fatigue ; Lung cancer ; Patient reported outcome measures ; Quality of life ; Radiation effects ; Symptom assessment

Classification:

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. C020 Epidemiologie von Krebs (C020)
Research Program(s):
  1. 313 - Krebsrisikofaktoren und Prävention (POF4-313) (POF4-313)

Appears in the scientific report 2025
Database coverage:
Medline ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF >= 5 ; JCR ; NationallizenzNationallizenz ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > C020
Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2025-01-02, last modified 2025-01-03



Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)