| Home > Publications database > Radical Surgery Compared to Bladder-Preserving Approaches for Limited Stage Small-Cell Bladder Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. |
| Journal Article | DKFZ-2025-01398 |
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
2025
CIG Media Group
Dallas, Tex.
This record in other databases:

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102389
Abstract: Small-cell bladder cancer (SCBC) is an aggressive and rare malignancy for which there is no clear optimal treatment strategy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the median overall survival (OS) of patients with limited-stage (LS) SCBC treated with either cystectomy-based multimodal therapy (CBMMT) or radiation-based multimodal therapy (RBMMT).A comprehensive search of PUBMED, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed for studies published before January 2024 according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies have assessed LS-SCBC disease and provided survival data for subgroups of patients undergoing radical surgery or bladder-preserving approaches to be deemed eligible. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors.Five studies comprising 1041 patients were analyzed. The pooled median OS for patients receiving RBMMT was 34.6 months (95% CI, 25.5-43.7), compared to 29.7 months (95% CI, 18.2-41.1) for those undergoing CBMMT. The main limitations are the retrospective nature of the included studies and the potential bias.This meta-analysis indicates that RBMMT may provide comparable outcomes to CBMMT in LS-SCBC patients, supporting the consideration of bladder-preserving approaches in selected cases. RBMMT may offer a potential clinical benefit in terms of organ preservation for appropriately selected patients, although survival differences were not statistically significant.
Keyword(s): Bladder cancer ; Chemotherapy ; Neuroendocrine tumor ; Radical cystectomy ; Small-cell tumor
|
The record appears in these collections: |