| Home > Publications database > Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Autism Spectrum Disorder Classification via Hyperspectral Imaging Analysis of Red Blood Cells |
| Journal Article | DKFZ-2026-02473 |
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
2026
IEEE
New York, NY
Abstract: Objective biological markers for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) remain an importantresearch goal because clinical assessment is behavior-based and ASD is heterogeneous. This study evaluatedwhether eight red-blood-cell (RBC) hyperspectral endmember distributions contain participant-level ASDversus-neurotypical classification signal under leakage-controlled validation. The cohort comprised 58 malechildren (27 ASD and 31 neurotypically developing), each with nine RBC hyperspectral acquisitions(522 acquisitions in total). Six classifiers were evaluated using 58-fold outer leave-one-subject-outcross-validation, with five-fold participant-grouped inner hyperparameter selection. The nine held-outprobabilities were averaged to obtain one prediction per participant. XGBoost achieved the highest observedfixed-threshold accuracy (0.828; 95% CI 0.724–0.914), F1-score (0.800; 0.667–0.906), Matthews correlationcoefficient (0.657), and lowest Brier score (0.155). Support Vector Machine achieved the highest AUROC(0.879; 0.784–0.952), average precision (AP; 0.891), and specificity (0.968), but lower sensitivity (0.630).Exact paired McNemar tests found no significant participant-level accuracy difference between XGBoost andthe other models (all p ≥ 0.109). Out-of-fold TreeSHAP identified Spectrum 1, Spectrum 2, Spectrum 5, andSpectrum 4 as the leading XGBoost features. These model-specific associations are hypothesis-generatingand do not establish molecular or causal specificity. The findings support further investigation of RBChyperspectral profiles, but the small, male-only, single-cohort design and absence of external validationpreclude claims of clinical generalizability or diagnostic readiness.
|
The record appears in these collections: |