Journal Article (Review Article) DKFZ-2020-01688

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

 ;  ;

2020
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands

The American journal of gastroenterology 115(1), 56 - 69 () [10.14309/ajg.0000000000000465]
 GO

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of colorectal cancers (CRCs), but evidence for variation in sensitivity according to the CRC stage is sparse and has not yet been systematically synthesized. Thus, our objective was to systematically review and summarize evidence on the stage-specific sensitivity of FITs.We screened PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 14, 2019, for English-language articles reporting on the stage-specific sensitivity of FIT for CRC detection using colonoscopy as a reference standard. Studies reporting stage-specific sensitivities and the specificity of FIT for CRC detection were included. Summary estimates of sensitivity according to the CRC stage and study setting (screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies) were derived from bivariate meta-analysis.Forty-four studies (92,447 participants including 3,034 CRC cases) were included. Pooled stage-specific sensitivities were overall very similar but suffered from high levels of imprecision because of small case numbers when calculated separately for screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies. Pooled sensitivities (95% confidence intervals) for all studies combined were 73% (65%-79%) for stage-I-CRCs and 80% (74%-84%), 82% (77%-87%), and 79% (70%-86%) for the detection of CRC stages II, III, and IV, respectively. Even substantially larger variation was seen in sensitivity by T-stage, with summary estimates ranging from 40% (21%-64%) for T1 to 83% (68%-91%) for T3-CRC.Although FITs detect 4 of 5 CRCs at stages II-IV, the substantially lower sensitivity for stage-I-CRC and, in particular, T1 CRC indicates both need and potential for further improvement in performance for the early detection of CRC.

Keyword(s): Biomarkers, Tumor: analysis (MeSH) ; Colonoscopy (MeSH) ; Colorectal Neoplasms: diagnosis (MeSH) ; Colorectal Neoplasms: metabolism (MeSH) ; Early Detection of Cancer: methods (MeSH) ; Feces: chemistry (MeSH) ; Humans (MeSH) ; Immunochemistry (MeSH) ; Neoplasm Staging: methods (MeSH) ; Biomarkers, Tumor

Classification:

Note: in PubMed: Meta-Analysis#EA:C070#LA:C070#

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. C070 Klinische Epidemiologie und Alternf. (C070)
  2. Präventive Onkologie (C120)
  3. DKTK HD zentral (HD01)
Research Program(s):
  1. 313 - Cancer risk factors and prevention (POF3-313) (POF3-313)

Appears in the scientific report 2020
Database coverage:
Medline ; BIOSIS Previews ; Biological Abstracts ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; Current Contents - Clinical Medicine ; Ebsco Academic Search ; Essential Science Indicators ; IF >= 10 ; JCR ; NCBI Molecular Biology Database ; SCOPUS ; Science Citation Index ; Science Citation Index Expanded ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Public records
Publications database

 Record created 2020-08-20, last modified 2024-02-29


Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)