Journal Article DKFZ-2025-01440

http://join2-wiki.gsi.de/foswiki/pub/Main/Artwork/join2_logo100x88.png
Variable Relative Biological Effectiveness of Protons in the Rat Spinal Cord: Measurements and Comparison With Model Calculations.

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

2025
Elsevier Amsterdam

Advances in radiation oncology 10(8), 101809 () [10.1016/j.adro.2025.101809]
 GO

This record in other databases:  

Please use a persistent id in citations: doi:

Abstract: To determine the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in the rat spinal cord after 6 fractions of protons as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) and dose.The rat spinal cord was irradiated at 4 different positions of a 6 cm spread-out Bragg peak using 6 fractions of protons (LET: 1.4, 2.7, 3.9, and 5.5 keV/µm). Dose-response curves were established for the endpoint paresis grade 2, and the RBE was calculated based on the dose at 50% effect probability. Including data with single and split doses, the measured RBE values were compared with predictions from 4 mechanistic, 3 phenomenological, and 2 patient-derived variable RBE models.With increasing LET, the dose at 50% effect probability decreased from 51.3 Gy to 43.3 Gy, resulting in a rise in the RBE from 1.11 to 1.32. The biologically equivalent dose decreased markedly between the 2 proximal and 2 distal spinal cord positions, resulting in extrapolated maximum RBE values of up to 1.87 in the limit of zero dose per fraction. The α/β values ranged between 1.5 Gy and 4.2 Gy. At 3.9 and 5.5 keV/µm, the RBE increased with decreasing dose, and at 1.8 Gy per fraction, the RBE was extrapolated to 1.40 and 1.42, respectively. The agreement between predicted and measured RBE varied between the different models.A fixed RBE of 1.1 provides a good approximation up to the center of the spread-out Bragg peak; however, at 3 mm from the distal end, the RBE increases markedly and may reach values above 1.4 at clinical fraction schedules. Using predictions from a variable RBE model may, therefore, be reasonable; however, the model and model parameters should be carefully selected, ideally as a consensus among the proton therapy centers.

Classification:

Note: #EA:E040#LA:E040#

Contributing Institute(s):
  1. E040 Med. Physik in der Strahlentherapie (E040)
  2. E220 Radioonkologie Radiobiologie (E220)
  3. E210 KKE Translationale Radioonkologie (E210)
  4. DKTK HD zentral (HD01)
Research Program(s):
  1. 315 - Bildgebung und Radioonkologie (POF4-315) (POF4-315)

Appears in the scientific report 2025
Database coverage:
Medline ; DOAJ ; Article Processing Charges ; Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List ; DOAJ Seal ; Emerging Sources Citation Index ; Fees ; IF < 5 ; JCR ; SCOPUS ; Web of Science Core Collection
Click to display QR Code for this record

The record appears in these collections:
Document types > Articles > Journal Article
Institute Collections > E040
Public records
Publication Charges
Publications database

 Record created 2025-07-21, last modified 2025-10-24


Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)